patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

CHP Releases Details of Fatal 110 Freeway Crash

A car caught fire after it was rear-ended Friday—and the flames prevented witnesses from rescuing an 11-month child trapped in the vehicle.

 

The California Highway Patrol has released its official report of a fatal car crash on the southbound 110 freeway near the York Boulevard exit that resulted in the death of an infant passenger on Friday evening.

The report indicates that the driver of the vehicle had pulled over in lane three of the congested freeway during rush hour because of a flat tire on the front passenger side:

"[The driver of the second vehicle] collided with the rear of the first vehicle. This caused [the first vehicle] to catch on fire and eventually become fully engulfed. The 1-year-old passenger of [the first vehicle] became trapped in her car seat as a result of the collision. Attempts were made by the involved parties and witnesses to remove the child from the vehicle but they were overcome by the fire and unsuccessful in their attempts. The child sustained fatal injuries."

According to CHP's so-called “incident report,” drugs or alcohol were "not a factor" in the incident and no arrests were made.

City News Service reported that several residents who live near the historic Arroyo Seco Parkway—the nation’s first freeway that was built in 1940 and has long been considered narrow and outdated—attempted to rescue the toddler, who was evidently trapped in the car.

One of the neighbors who attempted to save the child, identified as 11-month-old Leiana Ramirez, was Jair Aguirre. A 26-year-old community college student who lives in the neighborhood, Aguirre told the Los Angeles Times that he and three other neighborhood residents attempted to fight the fire with a water hose and buckets.

Aguirre also told the Times that he tried to remove the infant from the car after smashing the window with a baseball bat, but was burned and driven back by the growing flames inside the car.

The toddler killed in the crash was "barely 11 months" old, according to an official at the Los Angeles County Coroner's Office on Saturday. (It was previously reported that the victim was two years old.)

"The car caught fire immediately and the mother or other motorists could not get close enough to rescue the child," said South Pasadena Police Chief Joseph Payne. "The mother was burned on the hands and arms. The car was fully engulfed when we arrived on scene."

Matthew Spence, a spokesman for the Los Angeles Fire Department, said that "multiple patients were still being assessed" to determine the severity of their injuries resulting from the mishap.

The LAFD first sent an e-mail alert about the accident in the Highland Park area at 5:40 p.m.—and the CHP reports that police were still on the scene at around 7:30 p.m. Friday. A SigAlert was issued for three southbound lanes, reported the Pasadena Star-News.

A stretch of the winding, three-lane freeway was closed in the southbound direction toward the Los Angeles harbor while the crash was under investigation, according to the CHP.

Additional reading: See attached pdf of the California Department of Transportation's environmental impact report on the 110 freeway.

Related Topics: 110 Freeway, Arroyo Seco Parkway, and Fatal Crash
Do you agree with widespread public opinion that the historic Arroyo Seco Parkway is too narrow and outdated? Do you tend to avoid taking the freeway and driving on streets instead whenever possible? Tell us in the comments.

Anna Carpenter

9:36 am on Sunday, August 28, 2011

There's no emergency lane on the 110 freeway... that is the main problem. I cannot even express how this tragedy has affected me, even though I only read about it. It is so sad and my heart goes out to the mother, the family and the valiant residents that tried to help. I also think that baby seats should have a small tool to cut off the seat straps somewhere (obviously out of the reach of the baby). Incidentally I also think cars should have such a tool by the cup holder for adult seat belts.

Reply

Susan R

11:14 am on Sunday, August 28, 2011

Poor child was trapped in the car seat. Those are death traps.
http://www.fiberpipe.net/~tiktin/

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Ajay Singh

12:08 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

Susan—in much of the world, including America, it is almost the stuff of urban legend that people have been "saved" from catastrophe on the road because they weren't wearing seat belts. The context: Instead of being trapped by a belt—or child seat as in the case of this 11-month child—the accident victim is "freed" just enough to be saved by "nature" (gravity, specific circumstances of the accident, chance etc.). This is particularly true in fires, but also in cases in which a vehicle otherwise headed for certain oblivion suddenly has one of its doors open on impact (usually not a headlong collision), miraculously appearing to release a person inside the "death trap." On balance, it's pretty certain most statistics will show that far more lives are *saved* from restraints such as child seats and seat belts than are lost.

Moonstarr

11:40 am on Sunday, August 28, 2011

my tears are running down my face I am so sorry there have been so many lifes lost on this fwy many frinends have died there.

Reply

carol van beek

1:04 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

Would a slower speed limit help? I only drive on the 110 occasionally, but when I do there seems to be cars that are going much to fast for the curving lane conditions.

Reply

Kathy Carrido

3:08 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

The speed limit on the 110 north of downtown is 55mph for good reason...it is winding with little straightaway. I avoid it because too many drivers go 65+mph even in the third (merging) lane. Slow down and save lives. RIP sweet princess.

Reply

Scott Rubel

5:59 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

I can't stand this kind of reporting. They don't report what make of car this is. I haven't seen a Pinto in a long time. What a huge fight we had getting that one fixed. We should know what make it is, or an explanation of how it would catch fire from being smacked.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott Rubel

6:13 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

I found out in another report. It was a Nissan Altima and a GMC Yukon SUV. A car should never catch fire from an impact. I just googled and found some anecdotal information about Nissans catching on fire without any cause at all.
<http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f1d1ccd/17>;

Zonia Trejo

10:10 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

I avoid the 110 as much as possible. The majority of traffic flows well beyond 55 mph, the exits & on-ramps leave little room for slowing down adequately or speeding up to go with the flow of traffic. I feel on an adrenaline rush throughout the whole run because my body goes on high alert around the bends and curves. That stretch of the 110 is as close to a race track as I imagine one to be. I recognize it's place in history, but I believe authorities should look into making physical changes to the fwy itself.

Reply

Susan R

10:59 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

Problem is there are no real statistics on how many lives were saved and were lost by using seatbelts. And, there is a another message besides that and that is freedom of choose. Government should not be there to save us from ourselves.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris Colburn

10:36 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011

I beg to differ and think you have your wires crossed. I have been in the medical field as an EMT/Firefighter and an ER nurse for almost 20 combined years. In that time, I've responded to hundreds of accidents and seen scores more victims of crashes in the ER. The factor in ALL of their survival from their injuries were properly worn safety restraints and child safety seats. Of all of the fatal accidents where my team had to extricate the victim (cut them out of the car with heavy machinery) or they were ejected from the vehicle, well above 90% were unrestrained. I have seen seatbelts and child seats save lives first-hand. So to prove your "no real statistics theory" wrong and prove my point, here is just a few excerpts from "peer reviewed" (that means the results are concurred with by evaluating the data presented by others in the same research field) academic studies of credible origin. So, believe what you will and don't wear your seatbelt. I'll be more than happy to say "I told you so" when I see you in my ER.
http://www.jmu.edu/safetyplan/vehicle/generaldriver/safetybelt.shtml
http://www.nsc.org/safety_road/DriverSafety/Pages/SeatBelts.aspx

Becky Goodrich

11:24 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

My 21 yr. old son was on the scene of this horrific tragedy. He stopped to help break the windows but the car became engulfed & he & all of the others had to stand by helplessly while a small baby girl died. I am disgusted that so dangerous a freeway is in Los Angeles, of all places. This baby died simply because there is no emergency lane. Not one improvement has been made on a freeway that is too narrow for the Los Angeles traffic flow. I can't imagine what Leianna's mother is suffering. My son was 5 ft. away from this tragic loss of an innocent life. Maybe the Historical Society should speak to him before fighting improvements & changes that must be made. I hope that others out there will join me in demanding that local officials take action & let's bring media attention to this problem.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christina

2:18 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011

Hi Becky. My twin sister an I were there too. It's the most terrifying thing I've ever seen. I was looking on this site to see if a petition, or any action had been taken. If not, I was going to start something. Please let me know what you're thinking of doing, and if there's anything I can do to help support the cause. Something has to be done about this terrible road.

Patch_comments_icon

Patrick Lee

10:58 am on Monday, August 29, 2011

Hi Susan: There are decades of research proving without a shadow of a doubt that seat belts save lives. Here's just some of the data: http://www.nhtsa.gov/Driving+Safety/Occupant+Protection ... The issue isn't just freedom of choice. It's the cost to society of allowing people to die or suffer horrible debilitating and expensive injuries when there is a simple preventative measure that benefits all of us. Your choice to get yourself killed does not mean you can impose the cost of caring for your family and survivors on the rest of us.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Ajay Singh

11:45 am on Monday, August 29, 2011

Thanks for highlighting those pertinent facts, Patrick.

(Susan: you're not actually advocating "free choice" when it comes to road accidents, are you?—As I recall, you condemned child seats but didn't suggest concrete alternatives—and I sure hope you don't think children are better off traveling without any sort of restraint built into the vehicle at all.)

audrey calderon

7:11 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011

This little girl was adorable, fun, loving. I was honored to say I knew this angel and I'm heartbroken. I loved her very much and i only hope i can be their for my friend as she deals with this horrific loss.

Reply

Jeff

7:15 am on Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Perhaps, because of the short on ramps and no emergency lane, this should be de-clasified as a freeway by Caltrans. This would allow slower speeds by merely being a roadway, even with traffic signals to create traffic breaks and allow safe ingress onto the roadway.

Reply

Jennifer Henry

12:10 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011

I drive this freeway a lot to get to LA. People drive way too fast on it, like their own personal speedway. But something that drives me crazy is this freeway already had plenty of blind turns, and they just 'upgraded' it by putting in center dividers. These dividers get higher on turns to try and prevent someone that is out of control from going over to the other side. Instead it creates a blind turn. So if traffic is completely stopped, you have no idea. The so-called improvements were a horrible idea and made this already dangerous freeway worse.

Reply

carol van beek

7:05 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011

@Jeff
That is a great idea! I especially like the idea of allowing safe ingress.

Reply

Moonstarr

11:47 am on Wednesday, August 31, 2011

wasn't this rear ending on the straight away and isn't it the fault of the one that is not slowing down NOT to hit the driver in front of them?

Reply

Susan R

7:01 pm on Thursday, September 1, 2011

You are correct. The person that rear ended them was at fault. And, they probly do not have enough coverage on their auto insurance to cover a such a tragic accident like this. Hint, hint, make sure you have enough insurance. Raise the liability coverage. Accidents can and do happen.

Reply

Leave a comment