Improving Colorado Boulevard—What Eagle Rock Can Learn From Hermosa Beach
Making our neighborhood more friendly to pedestrians and bikes isn't exactly rocket science.
Parking—or its lack thereof—has long been a contentious issue in Eagle Rock. (Those of you who witnessed the “Fat Dog” ruckus a few years ago need no reminders about our neighborhood’s parking problems.) To cite just one example, a lack of adequate parking to meet the zoning requirements of the Colorado Boulevard Specific Plan has been an impediment to new restaurants coming to Eagle Rock.
There are some who would relax or abolish the Specific Plan, but I believe it is the foundation that has allowed Colorado Boulevard to blossom. There are also many who would like to see a more pedestrian and bicycle-friendly neighborhood, with slower traffic speeds on Colorado. This point was at the forefront of peoples’ minds after that horrific accident a few years ago in which several young people from Eagle Rock were killed when their car collided with a Magnolia tree at an excessively high speed on Colorado Boulevard.
A trip to Hermosa Beach showed me an example of how many of these issues could be addressed without spending a huge amount of money on infrastructure. Hermosa Avenue in Hermosa Beach has similar attributes to Colorado Boulevard in Eagle Rock. Properties for commercial and residential use are in close proximity; parking is at a premium, especially during beach-going weather; there’s a proliferation of pedestrians and bike riders alike, making slower traffic speeds and safety an issue. (To get an idea of how Hermosa Beach has balanced those needs, take a look at the photos to your right.)
Parking is doubled over conventional right-curb-only parking because there is another parking lane against the median. Here are some key features to notice that make this work: There is a bump-out at the end of each median. This helps prevent drivers from wandering into the parking lane if there are no parked cars, and then rear-ending a parked car further up the street.
Another important provision is that although both cars and bikes share the right lane, this is done not side by side but rather in tandem. This simultaneously accomplishes two important things: Cars in the right lane are forced to go no faster than the bicyclists—and that greatly reduces the possibility of right-turning cars cutting off and colliding with cyclists. Right turn collision danger is a serious problem with the conventional arrangement of a separate right-hand-bicycle-only-lane because the cars must cross in front of the cyclists when turning right.
When cars park against the median, drivers and passengers are supposed to walk along the median to the crosswalk to cross the street instead of jaywalking. As you can see from one of the photos, the median is obstructed in places by planter boxes that deter jaywalkers. In Eagle Rock, we can do even better, given that our medians are wider, making them ideal spots for planter boxes.
The width of Hermosa Avenue, curb to median, is exactly 39 feet and two inches. This is slightly narrower than the width of Colorado Boulevard, which is 40 feet, according to a drawing provided by SALT Landscape Architects and posted on Eagle Rock resident Jane Tsong’s Bipediality blog. So the same arrangement on Hermosa Avenue should fit on Colorado Boulevard.
Most intersections on Hermosa Avenue are four-way stops, which also helps to slow the traffic. We may need to implement forced stops at a few strategic intersections on Colorado Boulevard to accomplish the same thing.
There’s little doubt that the traffic model in Hermosa Beach strikes the best balance between parking and a pedestrian/bike friendly business district. It should be a no-brainer for Eagle Rock.
David Gustavson
3:22 pm on Sunday, April 24, 2011
Thanks Ajay for getting this article out on patch.com . The only correction is in the paragraph that compares the width of Hermosa Avenue, at 39 feet and two inches to the width of Colorado Blvd. which measures 40 feet (not inches) primarily in that stretch of roadway that has the grassy medians.
Helen Gustavson
Ajay Singh
3:26 pm on Sunday, April 24, 2011
Corrected to 40 feet, Helen! Apologies for the error.
Savateuse
9:07 am on Monday, April 25, 2011
I do not cease to be amazed at how many people want Colorado Blvd. to slow down. For heavens sake, why? Unlike the rest of Los Angeles, our main street makes it easy and efficient to get where you need to go. Why is that a bad thing??
And Colorado has nice wide sidewalks and plenty of traffic lights for crossing. It is already pedestrian friendly.
Severin Martinez
11:21 am on Monday, April 25, 2011
Is it pleasant to listen to cars zooming when you're trying to dine outside at a local restaurant along Colorado? Have you tried crossing at Colorado/Hermose? Cars hardly respect pedestrians at this crosswalk and only slam on the brakes because I'm in the middle of their path. Also, there aren't as many crosswalks as one would like, in my opinion.
Getting places easily and efficiently isn't a bad thing. However, when cars control Colorado at the expense pedestrians, and cyclists and transit users, and compromise safety for all users, and discourage walking or cycling because of the unpleasant and dangerous nature- this is a problem. IT definitely isn't easy to be on Colorado as a cyclist- might be efficient, but not easy. It might be easy to make left-turns as a car, but when you're a pedestrian wishing to cross the street and your intersection has no crosswalk or a signal that forces you to wait very long to cross- this isn't easy nor efficient.
Also, if Colorado is so pedestrian friendly, why do I see hardly any people walking? Maybe it's pleasant if you park your car at a broken meter, walk to your desired establishment, then walk back to your car, but this isn't a friendly street if you're trying to hold a conversation with a friend, stroll along the boulevard, and cross wherever you please.
Perhaps pedestrian friendly compared to some places, but that isnt say much.The street needs to be more equitable and considerate of people who are not driving.
Severin Martinez
9:12 pm on Monday, April 25, 2011
Two things:
1) sorry for the many mistakes in my comment Hermosa, not Hermose. It, not IT and "but that isn't saying much" rather than "but that isnt say much".
2) Realized my comment may seem hostile, that's not my intention, just rather passionate about this issue.
Scott Martin-Rowe
8:54 pm on Monday, April 25, 2011
Do it! It would be fairly cheap, totally enhance the Colorado corridor in ER, and possibly inspire someone to turn the Farley Brother's Storage building into a four-screen movie theater.
Leslie
7:18 pm on Saturday, July 9, 2011
What a great use for the Farley Building!!! I would hope that the Colorado Corridor would run as far West as College View in order to slow down the traffic coming in from Glendale.
Jack Burnett-Stuart
12:46 pm on Thursday, April 28, 2011
I am entirely in sympathy with Dave's opinions. But the precondition for parking along the median would of course be that cars stop using Colorado as a highway with highway like speeds. It is 1.6 miles from the post office to Swork. If the average speed was reduced through a variety of traffic slowing measures (including changing the speed limit, but does anyone pay any attention to that?) from say 40 mph to 20mph, that would add 2 minutes 24 seconds to the time the trip takes. Surely that is not asking too much of any driver, when the payoff could be a city street with a balance of cars, public transportation, cycles and pedestrians that could become a hub for the surrounding community? We should all get involved in TERA's initiative and make sure change happens.
STARCHY
10:36 am on Sunday, June 19, 2011
Nothing would improve Eagle Rock more than running the ALMA LODGE and its "tenants" out of town. nothing.
enough with the panhandling and shopping carts and dazed stares- they gotta go!!!!