.

Candidates Strive For Distinction in Four-Way Race for Assembly

All progressive democrats, they stress their public service or business backgrounds.

The four candidates in the race for California's 51st Assembly District tried to distinguish themselves to voters during a forum held at the Glassell Park Recreation Center on Thursday evening.

Because they all shared similar progressive agendas, candidates Luis Lopez, Arturo Chavez, Oscar Gutierrez and Jimmy Gomez spoke largely about how their backgrounds in public service or business uniquely qualified them to serve the district that comprises all of Northeast Los Angeles and parts of Echo Park and Silver Lake.

Lopez—who served as co-chair of the Silver Lake Neighborhood Council for four years, and is currently president of the East Area Planning Commission—touted his experience navigating the halls of government.

"I know how to listen, I know how to bring people together and I know how to move an agenda forward," Lopez said.

Chavez, who is the district director for State Assembly Member Gil Cedillo, touted a keen understanding of local issues in Northeast Los Angeles.

A former field deputy for Council Member Ed Reyes, Chavez said he wouldn't need to learn about Northeast L.A. on the job.

"We're Democrats, we're all pretty much the same on policy issues," Chavez said. "The difference is, is how we get things done. As a district director, that's my job—to get things done in these communities."

Gomez, political director for the United Nurses Association of California, painted himself as a communicator who would empower residents by personally fielding their concerns.

To demonstrate his commitment to community feedback, Gomez shared his cell phone number with the audience—(323) 863-5461.

The one wild card, both during Thursday's forum and in the overall scheme of the race, was Gutierrez.

Towering over the candidates and speaking with booming enthusiasm, the former accounts executive and television producer vowed to track down tax scofflaws and promote a more conducive business environment to increase California's flagging annual revenues.

"Our constituents shouldn't have to decide between a gallon of gas or a gallon of milk," Gutierrez declared.

The candidates fielded a series of questions about supporting education, increasing taxes on the wealthy, addressing the loss of businesses in California, the budget, transportation and the enforcement of local laws.

In general, the candidates took similar policy stances, while trying to carve out their own unique approaches to solving the state's problems.

On the issue of taxation, for example, each agreed that they were in favor of increasing the tax burden on the State's wealthiest residents, but Gutierrez stressed the important of vigilance enforcing tax laws to increase revenue.

"We must go after the scofflaws," he stressed.

Each of the candidates asserted their opposition to proposed State Route-710 extension through El Sereno and South Pasadena.

As an El Sereno resident, Chavez spoke specifically about the need for traffic calming measures in local communities caused by congestion on the southern portion of the 710, and floated the idea of building out that freeway in order to relieve the burden on local residents.

The most local topic discussed during the evening was the need to address noise and air pollution concerns stemming from the Metrolink service station in Cypress Park.

The candidates offered broad responses to the question, expressing a need to bring Metrolink CEOs together with community members to find a solution.

Chavez noted that Cedillo's office played a role in pressuring Metrolink staff to attend a community meeting in January with concerned citizens, but some audience members seemed unimpressed with the progress that had been made on the issue so far--shaking their heads in disappointment as Chavez spoke.

The primary election for this race will be held on Tuesday, June 5. The general election will be held on November 6.

Oscar Gutierrez April 14, 2012 at 02:00 AM
"Our constituents shouldn't have to decide between a gallon of gas or a gallon of milk," Gutierrez declared. (Milk is around $3.50 a gallon and Gas is about $4.20 for 87 octane) Californian's already pay higher prices for gas and part of that is taxes (18 cents federal, 35 cents state and about 30 cents local) about 84 cents per gallon in taxes. That is approximately $10.08 for every 12 gallons or an additional $1,048.32 a year more in taxes at the pump on average. I will fight for you to lower gasoline taxes in our state.
Rob Schraff April 14, 2012 at 02:49 AM
Great...more traffic, more pollution, and less tax revenue in a state that used to lead in education and health care but now ranks with places like Alabama and Mississippi. And who is going to fix potholes? Milk drinkers? Mitt Romney? As Bugs Bunny would say - What a maroon!
Rob Schraff April 14, 2012 at 02:58 AM
Ajay - The above only represents my opinion, and is protected political speech. Further, if I claim to represent others in my comments, I will quote and cite them, seemingly going well beyond Patch editorial (much less Patch "editorial blogger") policy for transparency in this regard. Best - Rob P.S. - Maybe you should do more serious looking into this Gutierrez and his history, no? Former Account Executive and Producer. Really? For who and what?
Susan R April 25, 2012 at 02:39 PM
Rob, it sounds like you do not want lower taxes on gas to lower the price of gas? Who doesn't want lower gas prices right now? At least Oscar knows economics 101. California has the highest tax on gas in the Nation. More than 80 cents a gallon goes for taxes. At least Oscar knows that the high gas prices are hurting people in the pocket book, especially the working poor. Sounds like Oscar cares about people that have to choose between food and gas to get to work.
Rob Schraff April 25, 2012 at 03:17 PM
You are correct! I don't want lower taxes on gas, I want higher taxes on gas. Among other things, this might pay for pothole repair and sound wall construction, as was recently commented upon in Patch. It would also tax road use, cutting traffic and improving air quality. So, if Oscar really cares about people more than where his next meal is coming from, see my note above on his profession, he should care more about mass transit, the rape of the LAUSD by charter schools, local mortgage and loan fraud by Wall Street...dozens of more important issues than the price of gas. (caused largely, by the way, by two Bush Iraq Wars and Netanyahoo's warmongering. Yep, Susan, turns out the Iraq wars were massive tax and military subsidies for the oil bidness. Cheney alone made a killing for Halliburton.) So it sounds like more folks than Oscar needs to take econ. 101 - making an anti-tax argument in every case is just wrong. You can have roads and taxes, or neither.
Susan R April 25, 2012 at 04:03 PM
We already pay high taxes for roads and all the other stuff you mention. The money is NOT being spent where it is suppose to go. And, you want more taxes when the unemployed and low income are already suffering? Obama spent more in 3 years than Bush spent on 2 wars. Follow the money trail. Money for cash for clunkers, free $4,000 tax credit for golf carts for the rich, free bailouts for people that took out home loans they could not afford, bail out of the car industry, ect. Follow the money trail. Obama spent more in 3 years than Bush spent in 8 years and 2 wars.
Rob Schraff April 25, 2012 at 04:36 PM
Actually, tax rates in California have been dropping for decades, and that is indeed why roads are in such poor repair, and schools have dropped to the level of Mississippi. And your facts on Bush and Obama spending are also simply wrong - wars are just a teensy bit more expensive than the other things you mention and, it turns out, so was crashing the economy and bailing out the Bush family's Wall Street buddies. Not to mention the expense of Bush's massive tax cut for the rich. And in CA, the money is going right where Republicans want it to go - prisons. Sounds like some basic CA and U.S. history classes might be in order, too.
Susan R April 26, 2012 at 06:27 AM
What about bailing car dealerships? We bailed out Wall street there too. What about the ten billion dollar high speed train? What about bailing out the banks? We bailed out Wall street there too. If Bush bailed out Wall street buddies, he also bailed out everyone that has a 401k plan.
Rob Schraff April 26, 2012 at 01:52 PM
What about not making stuff up as you write? Obama didn't save just car dealerships, but the whole auto industry. And trust me, those of us with a 401k plans lost plenty thanks to three generations of Bush family servitude to Wall Street.
Susan R April 26, 2012 at 03:41 PM
Well, Obama saved the car industry by buying up the auto industry stock. That saved Wall Street investors. And, Obama gave out $4,000 tax credits for golf carts. Who do you think took advantage of that tax break? Guess who? The rich. And, what about cash for clunkers at $4,000 a pop? We will be paying for all that debt for the next 2 decades. And, taxpayers have to bail out people that took out home loans they could not afford and then walked away from them or they borrowed the then equity and bought all kinds of goodies and then walked away from the home. Making stuff up? No. Just telling it like it is. The truth hurts. +
Susan R April 26, 2012 at 03:47 PM
Things are bad in California because hard working taxpayers are tired of footing the bill for freebies for others and are moving out of state. And, businesses are tired of all the regulations (laws) put upon them and paying outrageous taxes. I bet most people do not know how much small businesses are taxed and how much they struggle to keep the business alive. Now we are told that anyone making $250,000 a year is in the 1% but what if half that income goes toward keeping their business open? Are they still in the 1% and will be taxed more?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something