.

Huizar Wants Public Out of City Hall Park by 7 p.m.

The Council member pushes for an ordinance to ‘help protect and maintain’ the grounds where Occupy L.A. protesters camped for two months.

When daylight fades in sunny Los Angeles and night sets in depends on the time of the year. (Today, Thursday, for example, the sun sets at 7:16 p.m. in Los Angeles, according to SunriseSunset.com.) But if has his way, the sprawling lawns of City Hall—which are still being restored after the prolonged Occupy L.A. sit-in from last fall—will close to the public well before sunset: at 7 p.m. daily.

According to the Los Angeles Times, Huizar introduced a motion in the City Council Wednesday, asking City Attorney Carmen Trutanich to prepare an ordinance that would “help protect and maintain” City Hall’s 1.7-acre park, which includes some of the finest lawns in town, by restricting public access to them from 6 a.m. through 7 p.m.

Read the full Times report here.

The City Hall park has been closed since December, when police arrested hundreds of Occupy L.A. demonstrators camped there as part of nationwide protest against economic and social inequalities. Previously open to the public from 5 a.m. to 10 p.m., the park is expected to reopen next month after City crews wind up an elaborate restoration project that will have cost the taxpayer nearly $400,000, reports the Times.

Shortly after the park was cleared in December, Eagle Rock Patch featured a lengthy two-part interview with Huizar in which the Council member was asked why he and his colleagues chose not to enforce the law by allowing Occupy L.A. protesters to camp overnight on the City Hall premises—and why the same set of laws were later enforced to evict them.

Here’s what Huizar told Patch—:

Patch: You were one of the Council members who welcomed the Occupy L.A. protesters in October. Why do you think the City Council allowed protesters to first break the law and then have them arrested under the same set of laws?

Huizar: What we did as a Council is that we voted for a resolution that supported the message that the Occupiers brought with them, which was that we need to do something as a country to focus on people losing their homes, people losing their jobs. What we didn’t say—and the resolution didn’t say—was that you could stay there [on the City Hall lawns] as long as you want, whenever you want. I think that was a specific Council member [who] said, ‘stay as long as you want.’

The talk at the time when we passed a resolution was that they [Occupy L.A. protesters] would follow the law just as any other person wanting to use that space. As a public space, people can go there during the day, but it closes at night. The discussion was that at nighttime, those tents have to be rolled up—they can’t be in a public area.

That was the idea—that’s what I supported. And although I agree with their message, I would be in violation of our Constitution if I preferred their message and allowed them to stay there [as opposed to] if I didn’t support a message that I disagree with and not allow them to stay there.

I think what we did was the correct thing to do. Given the frustration that you see in the country, given the emotion, it wasn’t the right time to clamp down and say, ‘you’re violating City ordinances.’ But we couldn’t allow this to go on forever—it’s not within the law, it is not healthy, it is not safe. On the other hand, you allow them to express their message and you allow a situation where things settle in a peaceful manner—and that’s what happened.

Rob Tossberg April 06, 2012 at 06:47 PM
As a voting resident of Eagle Rock, I find Mr. Huizar's comments to be complete hog wash. First, this guy makes around $170k a year - when he comes down off his throne and speaks with us regular people, he's the richest guy in the room. He sends his children to Private School, God forbid they go to a public school! So, do you think he stands with the 99%??? Of course not! We live in a desert, why should their be a lawn around City Hall for yours and my dollars to pay for watering? What about all the homeless people, the people who have lost their homes through the bogus bank loans that caused so much havoc and destruction in our nation. Is Mr. Huizar concerned about those laws that were broken? OF course not. Mr. Huizar doesn't represent the 99% he represents the political system that is so corrupted by money that it's become incapable of governing and looking after the best interests of 99% of Los Angeles.
Ajay Singh (Editor) April 06, 2012 at 07:14 PM
For the record, Rob, I think Huizar sends his kids to Catholic school, which isn't strictly speaking a "public school" of course but it isn't "private" either.
Nelson R Grande II April 06, 2012 at 07:43 PM
Huizar's $170k (highest in the nation) salary is paid for by the Public..He is consulting a lawyer paid for by the Public...In a building paid for by the Public...to restrict Public access to a lawn also paid for by the Public. I'm not sure I see the sense in this.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something